Login

eISSN :
pISSN : 2005-1042
Insert title here
Editor's & Reviewer's Guide

Review Procedures for Journal of the Chosun Natural Science

 

Article 1. (Purpose) The following rules are to be applied for the review procedures for manuscripts submitted to Journal of the Chosun Natural Science (JCNS).

 

Article 2. (Acknowledgment) After checking that the submitted manuscript, the Editorial Office will assign an accession code and a secret code to the manuscript, and acknowledge the receipt of the manuscript to the corresponding author.

 

Article 3. (Referee Selection)

(1) The Editorial Office will make a copy of the manuscript, and send it to an Editor in charge of the related subject. The copy will be sent to the Executive Editor, when the Editor is one of the authors of the manuscript. If the Executive

Editor is also a coauthor of the manuscript, the copy will be sent to an Editor in charge of the second related subject.

(2) For a manuscript submitted, a referee will be selected by the Editorial Board and will make a final decision as to the publication of the manuscript.

(3) When a referee is unable to review the manuscript, the Editorial Office will notify the person in charge of the manuscript, who will reselect a referee and notify the Editorial Office.

 

Article 4. (Referees' Reports)

(1) The referee will be requested to send a referee's report to the Editorial Office within two weeks of reception of the manuscript.

(2) After failing to receive the referee's report within two weeks, the Editorial Office will encourage the corresponding referee to send it promptly.

(3) The Editorial Office will send the reports received from the referee to the person in charge of the manuscript.

 

Article 5. (Review of the Referees' Reports)

(1) The person in charge of the manuscript will review the reports from all the referees and make a recommendation to the Editorial Board as to the publication of the manuscript.

(2) The Editorial Office will notify the referees' reports to the corresponding author of the manuscript for which a revision or a reexamine process is required.

(3) The person in charge of the manuscript will review the revision of the manuscript, and make a recommendation as to the publication of the manuscript.

(4) The revised manuscript for a reexamine will be sent to the referee who requested the revision.

(5) When the referees' opinion is in conflict with the author, the Editorial Board will select a judge and have the manuscript reexamined.

 

Article 6. (The Judge)

(1) The judge will review the manuscript and all the materials concerning the review process, and make a final decision and give a recommendation to the Editorial Board as to the publication of the manuscript.

(2) The judge can request a revision of the manuscript, and reexamine the revised manuscript.

 

Article 7. (Final Decision)

(1) The Editorial Board will make final decisions concerning the publication of manuscripts for which recommendations were made by the person in charge of the manuscript.

(2) When a final decision is made for the publication of a manuscript, the Editorial Office will notify the corresponding author of the decision as well as of the expected volume and issue numbers.

(3) When a final decision is made against the publication of a manuscript, the Editorial Office will notify the corresponding author of the decision as well as of the referees' reports.

 

Article 8. (Report of the Review Work)

(1) The person in charge of the manuscript is expected to make the monthly report of the review work to the Editorial Board.

(2) The Editorial Office is required to regularly report on the review processes to the Executive Editor.

 

Article 9. (Review Work of the Editorial Board) The Editorial Board will make decisions on the following.

(a) Selection of referees when the person in charge of the manuscript fails to select them

(b) Selection of a judge

(c) Publication of the submitted manuscripts.


  • 용어 변경











닫기    저장

·  ·  ·  ·